Vulnpedia
← Search CVEs

CVE-2026-112177

HIGH 7.3

Published 2026-10-20 · Last modified 2026-10-20

A flaw was found in Ghostscript as shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8. The correction for CVE-2019-14869 was omitted during the rebase from version 9.25 to 9.27, leaving privileged .forceput operations in the .charkeys procedure insufficiently protected. Processing a specially crafted PostScript file may allow an attacker to bypass -dSAFER restrictions and access files outside the permitted paths or execute commands with the permissions of the Ghostscript process.

ELEVATED IMPACT

Severe if exploited (CVSS 7.3), but no known exploitation and low modeled probability. Patch on a normal cadence.

Exploitation likelihood

0.4%chance of exploitation in 30 days · 29th percentile

○ In CISA KEV ○ Catalogued PoC

Impact if exploited

7.3CVSS 3.1 · HIGH

  • ConfidentialityLow
  • IntegrityLow
  • AvailabilityLow

What an attacker needs

  • ✓Access: Reachable over the network — no local access needed
  • ✓Privileges: No account or privileges required
  • ✓User interaction: No user interaction needed
  • ✓Complexity: No special conditions — reliably repeatable

✓ lowers the bar for an attacker · ⚠ raises it

Proof of concept

No public PoC is currently catalogued.

Search for new PoCs

Search GitHub now — results may be empty or unverified.

Tracked sources are checked daily for recent CVEs, including PoCs published after the original disclosure. A later release appears after a tracked source lists it and a refresh succeeds.

Data snapshot:

Affected

Vendors Red Hat

Products Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9

Weakness (CWE)

  • CWE-648: Incorrect Use of Privileged APIs

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

References and research data (JSON)

Vendor product assessments

Showing 32 of 39 vendor product statements; 7 omitted. Read the full vendor advisory.

  • ghostscript as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 · known affected

    Vendor assessment for this product only.

    pkg:rpm/redhat/ghostscript

    • workaround: Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability. --- CME Mitigation Guidance (2026-10-20) --- Disclaimer: The following mitigation solutions are provided as a courtesy, pending the application of an official patch. This content was generated utilizing AI tools in conjunction with data from https://cmetaxonomy.org. Customers are advised to independently evaluate and test these temporary mitigations within their own infrastructure. The highest-value action is to eliminate privileged .forceput operations in the .charkeys procedure to enforce -dSAFER sandbox boundaries: upgrade to the fixed Ghostscript builds, which replace .forceput invocations with standard put operations in the /.charkeys procedure in Resource/Init/gs_ttf.ps, closing all 2 injection vectors (crafted PostScript document, malicious TrueType font processing). Until patched, this is a concern on Ghostscript on Linux (RHEL 8) processing untrusted input, such as print or document-conversion services, so Restrict or halt processing of untrusted PostScript documents and TrueType font inputs across document-conversion and printing services that invoke Ghostscript. As a compensating measure, Use auditd to log unauthorized file access attempts and unexpected execve syscalls spawned by the Ghostscript process, Run SELinux in enforcing mode to confine the Ghostscript process to a restricted domain, Use Linux mount and PID namespaces to restrict filesystem and process visibility for Ghostscript execution, Deploy an EDR agent to detect and terminate unexpected shell or child process spawns from Ghostscript, and Use Falco or eBPF runtime security to detect anomalous child process execution and unauthorized file reads. These controls limit blast radius and contain exploitation, but they do not fix the underlying privileged .forceput sandbox bypass — apply the upstream patch to fully remediate. Highest-impact CME: CME-1002 Audit Subsystem (auditd) (medium)
    • none available: Affected
    Red Hat · CVE-2026-112177 · Updated 2026-10-20T20:58:39+00:00
  • ghostscript-doc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 · known affected

    Vendor assessment for this product only.

    pkg:rpm/redhat/ghostscript-doc

    • workaround: Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability. --- CME Mitigation Guidance (2026-10-20) --- Disclaimer: The following mitigation solutions are provided as a courtesy, pending the application of an official patch. This content was generated utilizing AI tools in conjunction with data from https://cmetaxonomy.org. Customers are advised to independently evaluate and test these temporary mitigations within their own infrastructure. The highest-value action is to eliminate privileged .forceput operations in the .charkeys procedure to enforce -dSAFER sandbox boundaries: upgrade to the fixed Ghostscript builds, which replace .forceput invocations with standard put operations in the /.charkeys procedure in Resource/Init/gs_ttf.ps, closing all 2 injection vectors (crafted PostScript document, malicious TrueType font processing). Until patched, this is a concern on Ghostscript on Linux (RHEL 8) processing untrusted input, such as print or document-conversion services, so Restrict or halt processing of untrusted PostScript documents and TrueType font inputs across document-conversion and printing services that invoke Ghostscript. As a compensating measure, Use auditd to log unauthorized file access attempts and unexpected execve syscalls spawned by the Ghostscript process, Run SELinux in enforcing mode to confine the Ghostscript process to a restricted domain, Use Linux mount and PID namespaces to restrict filesystem and process visibility for Ghostscript execution, Deploy an EDR agent to detect and terminate unexpected shell or child process spawns from Ghostscript, and Use Falco or eBPF runtime security to detect anomalous child process execution and unauthorized file reads. These controls limit blast radius and contain exploitation, but they do not fix the underlying privileged .forceput sandbox bypass — apply the upstream patch to fully remediate. Highest-impact CME: CME-1002 Audit Subsystem (auditd) (medium)
    • none available: Affected
    Red Hat · CVE-2026-112177 · Updated 2026-10-20T20:58:39+00:00
  • ghostscript-tools-dvipdf as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 · known affected

    Vendor assessment for this product only.

    pkg:rpm/redhat/ghostscript-tools-dvipdf

    • workaround: Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability. --- CME Mitigation Guidance (2026-10-20) --- Disclaimer: The following mitigation solutions are provided as a courtesy, pending the application of an official patch. This content was generated utilizing AI tools in conjunction with data from https://cmetaxonomy.org. Customers are advised to independently evaluate and test these temporary mitigations within their own infrastructure. The highest-value action is to eliminate privileged .forceput operations in the .charkeys procedure to enforce -dSAFER sandbox boundaries: upgrade to the fixed Ghostscript builds, which replace .forceput invocations with standard put operations in the /.charkeys procedure in Resource/Init/gs_ttf.ps, closing all 2 injection vectors (crafted PostScript document, malicious TrueType font processing). Until patched, this is a concern on Ghostscript on Linux (RHEL 8) processing untrusted input, such as print or document-conversion services, so Restrict or halt processing of untrusted PostScript documents and TrueType font inputs across document-conversion and printing services that invoke Ghostscript. As a compensating measure, Use auditd to log unauthorized file access attempts and unexpected execve syscalls spawned by the Ghostscript process, Run SELinux in enforcing mode to confine the Ghostscript process to a restricted domain, Use Linux mount and PID namespaces to restrict filesystem and process visibility for Ghostscript execution, Deploy an EDR agent to detect and terminate unexpected shell or child process spawns from Ghostscript, and Use Falco or eBPF runtime security to detect anomalous child process execution and unauthorized file reads. These controls limit blast radius and contain exploitation, but they do not fix the underlying privileged .forceput sandbox bypass — apply the upstream patch to fully remediate. Highest-impact CME: CME-1002 Audit Subsystem (auditd) (medium)
    • none available: Affected
    Red Hat · CVE-2026-112177 · Updated 2026-10-20T20:58:39+00:00
  • ghostscript-tools-fonts as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 · known affected

    Vendor assessment for this product only.

    pkg:rpm/redhat/ghostscript-tools-fonts

    • workaround: Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability. --- CME Mitigation Guidance (2026-10-20) --- Disclaimer: The following mitigation solutions are provided as a courtesy, pending the application of an official patch. This content was generated utilizing AI tools in conjunction with data from https://cmetaxonomy.org. Customers are advised to independently evaluate and test these temporary mitigations within their own infrastructure. The highest-value action is to eliminate privileged .forceput operations in the .charkeys procedure to enforce -dSAFER sandbox boundaries: upgrade to the fixed Ghostscript builds, which replace .forceput invocations with standard put operations in the /.charkeys procedure in Resource/Init/gs_ttf.ps, closing all 2 injection vectors (crafted PostScript document, malicious TrueType font processing). Until patched, this is a concern on Ghostscript on Linux (RHEL 8) processing untrusted input, such as print or document-conversion services, so Restrict or halt processing of untrusted PostScript documents and TrueType font inputs across document-conversion and printing services that invoke Ghostscript. As a compensating measure, Use auditd to log unauthorized file access attempts and unexpected execve syscalls spawned by the Ghostscript process, Run SELinux in enforcing mode to confine the Ghostscript process to a restricted domain, Use Linux mount and PID namespaces to restrict filesystem and process visibility for Ghostscript execution, Deploy an EDR agent to detect and terminate unexpected shell or child process spawns from Ghostscript, and Use Falco or eBPF runtime security to detect anomalous child process execution and unauthorized file reads. These controls limit blast radius and contain exploitation, but they do not fix the underlying privileged .forceput sandbox bypass — apply the upstream patch to fully remediate. Highest-impact CME: CME-1002 Audit Subsystem (auditd) (medium)
    • none available: Affected
    Red Hat · CVE-2026-112177 · Updated 2026-10-20T20:58:39+00:00
  • ghostscript-tools-printing as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 · known affected

    Vendor assessment for this product only.

    pkg:rpm/redhat/ghostscript-tools-printing

    • workaround: Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability. --- CME Mitigation Guidance (2026-10-20) --- Disclaimer: The following mitigation solutions are provided as a courtesy, pending the application of an official patch. This content was generated utilizing AI tools in conjunction with data from https://cmetaxonomy.org. Customers are advised to independently evaluate and test these temporary mitigations within their own infrastructure. The highest-value action is to eliminate privileged .forceput operations in the .charkeys procedure to enforce -dSAFER sandbox boundaries: upgrade to the fixed Ghostscript builds, which replace .forceput invocations with standard put operations in the /.charkeys procedure in Resource/Init/gs_ttf.ps, closing all 2 injection vectors (crafted PostScript document, malicious TrueType font processing). Until patched, this is a concern on Ghostscript on Linux (RHEL 8) processing untrusted input, such as print or document-conversion services, so Restrict or halt processing of untrusted PostScript documents and TrueType font inputs across document-conversion and printing services that invoke Ghostscript. As a compensating measure, Use auditd to log unauthorized file access attempts and unexpected execve syscalls spawned by the Ghostscript process, Run SELinux in enforcing mode to confine the Ghostscript process to a restricted domain, Use Linux mount and PID namespaces to restrict filesystem and process visibility for Ghostscript execution, Deploy an EDR agent to detect and terminate unexpected shell or child process spawns from Ghostscript, and Use Falco or eBPF runtime security to detect anomalous child process execution and unauthorized file reads. These controls limit blast radius and contain exploitation, but they do not fix the underlying privileged .forceput sandbox bypass — apply the upstream patch to fully remediate. Highest-impact CME: CME-1002 Audit Subsystem (auditd) (medium)
    • none available: Affected
    Red Hat · CVE-2026-112177 · Updated 2026-10-20T20:58:39+00:00
  • ghostscript-x11 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 · known affected

    Vendor assessment for this product only.

    pkg:rpm/redhat/ghostscript-x11

    • workaround: Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability. --- CME Mitigation Guidance (2026-10-20) --- Disclaimer: The following mitigation solutions are provided as a courtesy, pending the application of an official patch. This content was generated utilizing AI tools in conjunction with data from https://cmetaxonomy.org. Customers are advised to independently evaluate and test these temporary mitigations within their own infrastructure. The highest-value action is to eliminate privileged .forceput operations in the .charkeys procedure to enforce -dSAFER sandbox boundaries: upgrade to the fixed Ghostscript builds, which replace .forceput invocations with standard put operations in the /.charkeys procedure in Resource/Init/gs_ttf.ps, closing all 2 injection vectors (crafted PostScript document, malicious TrueType font processing). Until patched, this is a concern on Ghostscript on Linux (RHEL 8) processing untrusted input, such as print or document-conversion services, so Restrict or halt processing of untrusted PostScript documents and TrueType font inputs across document-conversion and printing services that invoke Ghostscript. As a compensating measure, Use auditd to log unauthorized file access attempts and unexpected execve syscalls spawned by the Ghostscript process, Run SELinux in enforcing mode to confine the Ghostscript process to a restricted domain, Use Linux mount and PID namespaces to restrict filesystem and process visibility for Ghostscript execution, Deploy an EDR agent to detect and terminate unexpected shell or child process spawns from Ghostscript, and Use Falco or eBPF runtime security to detect anomalous child process execution and unauthorized file reads. These controls limit blast radius and contain exploitation, but they do not fix the underlying privileged .forceput sandbox bypass — apply the upstream patch to fully remediate. Highest-impact CME: CME-1002 Audit Subsystem (auditd) (medium)
    • none available: Affected
    Red Hat · CVE-2026-112177 · Updated 2026-10-20T20:58:39+00:00
  • ghostscript.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 · known affected

    Vendor assessment for this product only.

    pkg:rpm/redhat/ghostscript?arch=src

    • workaround: Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability. --- CME Mitigation Guidance (2026-10-20) --- Disclaimer: The following mitigation solutions are provided as a courtesy, pending the application of an official patch. This content was generated utilizing AI tools in conjunction with data from https://cmetaxonomy.org. Customers are advised to independently evaluate and test these temporary mitigations within their own infrastructure. The highest-value action is to eliminate privileged .forceput operations in the .charkeys procedure to enforce -dSAFER sandbox boundaries: upgrade to the fixed Ghostscript builds, which replace .forceput invocations with standard put operations in the /.charkeys procedure in Resource/Init/gs_ttf.ps, closing all 2 injection vectors (crafted PostScript document, malicious TrueType font processing). Until patched, this is a concern on Ghostscript on Linux (RHEL 8) processing untrusted input, such as print or document-conversion services, so Restrict or halt processing of untrusted PostScript documents and TrueType font inputs across document-conversion and printing services that invoke Ghostscript. As a compensating measure, Use auditd to log unauthorized file access attempts and unexpected execve syscalls spawned by the Ghostscript process, Run SELinux in enforcing mode to confine the Ghostscript process to a restricted domain, Use Linux mount and PID namespaces to restrict filesystem and process visibility for Ghostscript execution, Deploy an EDR agent to detect and terminate unexpected shell or child process spawns from Ghostscript, and Use Falco or eBPF runtime security to detect anomalous child process execution and unauthorized file reads. These controls limit blast radius and contain exploitation, but they do not fix the underlying privileged .forceput sandbox bypass — apply the upstream patch to fully remediate. Highest-impact CME: CME-1002 Audit Subsystem (auditd) (medium)
    • none available: Affected
    Red Hat · CVE-2026-112177 · Updated 2026-10-20T20:58:39+00:00
  • libgs as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 · known affected

    Vendor assessment for this product only.

    pkg:rpm/redhat/libgs

    • workaround: Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability. --- CME Mitigation Guidance (2026-10-20) --- Disclaimer: The following mitigation solutions are provided as a courtesy, pending the application of an official patch. This content was generated utilizing AI tools in conjunction with data from https://cmetaxonomy.org. Customers are advised to independently evaluate and test these temporary mitigations within their own infrastructure. The highest-value action is to eliminate privileged .forceput operations in the .charkeys procedure to enforce -dSAFER sandbox boundaries: upgrade to the fixed Ghostscript builds, which replace .forceput invocations with standard put operations in the /.charkeys procedure in Resource/Init/gs_ttf.ps, closing all 2 injection vectors (crafted PostScript document, malicious TrueType font processing). Until patched, this is a concern on Ghostscript on Linux (RHEL 8) processing untrusted input, such as print or document-conversion services, so Restrict or halt processing of untrusted PostScript documents and TrueType font inputs across document-conversion and printing services that invoke Ghostscript. As a compensating measure, Use auditd to log unauthorized file access attempts and unexpected execve syscalls spawned by the Ghostscript process, Run SELinux in enforcing mode to confine the Ghostscript process to a restricted domain, Use Linux mount and PID namespaces to restrict filesystem and process visibility for Ghostscript execution, Deploy an EDR agent to detect and terminate unexpected shell or child process spawns from Ghostscript, and Use Falco or eBPF runtime security to detect anomalous child process execution and unauthorized file reads. These controls limit blast radius and contain exploitation, but they do not fix the underlying privileged .forceput sandbox bypass — apply the upstream patch to fully remediate. Highest-impact CME: CME-1002 Audit Subsystem (auditd) (medium)
    • none available: Affected
    Red Hat · CVE-2026-112177 · Updated 2026-10-20T20:58:39+00:00
  • libgs-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 · known affected

    Vendor assessment for this product only.

    pkg:rpm/redhat/libgs-devel

    • workaround: Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability. --- CME Mitigation Guidance (2026-10-20) --- Disclaimer: The following mitigation solutions are provided as a courtesy, pending the application of an official patch. This content was generated utilizing AI tools in conjunction with data from https://cmetaxonomy.org. Customers are advised to independently evaluate and test these temporary mitigations within their own infrastructure. The highest-value action is to eliminate privileged .forceput operations in the .charkeys procedure to enforce -dSAFER sandbox boundaries: upgrade to the fixed Ghostscript builds, which replace .forceput invocations with standard put operations in the /.charkeys procedure in Resource/Init/gs_ttf.ps, closing all 2 injection vectors (crafted PostScript document, malicious TrueType font processing). Until patched, this is a concern on Ghostscript on Linux (RHEL 8) processing untrusted input, such as print or document-conversion services, so Restrict or halt processing of untrusted PostScript documents and TrueType font inputs across document-conversion and printing services that invoke Ghostscript. As a compensating measure, Use auditd to log unauthorized file access attempts and unexpected execve syscalls spawned by the Ghostscript process, Run SELinux in enforcing mode to confine the Ghostscript process to a restricted domain, Use Linux mount and PID namespaces to restrict filesystem and process visibility for Ghostscript execution, Deploy an EDR agent to detect and terminate unexpected shell or child process spawns from Ghostscript, and Use Falco or eBPF runtime security to detect anomalous child process execution and unauthorized file reads. These controls limit blast radius and contain exploitation, but they do not fix the underlying privileged .forceput sandbox bypass — apply the upstream patch to fully remediate. Highest-impact CME: CME-1002 Audit Subsystem (auditd) (medium)
    • none available: Affected
    Red Hat · CVE-2026-112177 · Updated 2026-10-20T20:58:39+00:00
  • ghostscript as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 · known not affected

    Vendor assessment for this product only.

    Reason: vulnerable code not present

    pkg:rpm/redhat/ghostscript

    Red Hat · CVE-2026-112177 · Updated 2026-10-20T20:58:39+00:00
  • ghostscript-doc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 · known not affected

    Vendor assessment for this product only.

    Reason: vulnerable code not present

    pkg:rpm/redhat/ghostscript-doc

    Red Hat · CVE-2026-112177 · Updated 2026-10-20T20:58:39+00:00
  • ghostscript-tools-fonts as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 · known not affected

    Vendor assessment for this product only.

    Reason: vulnerable code not present

    pkg:rpm/redhat/ghostscript-tools-fonts

    Red Hat · CVE-2026-112177 · Updated 2026-10-20T20:58:39+00:00
  • ghostscript-tools-printing as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 · known not affected

    Vendor assessment for this product only.

    Reason: vulnerable code not present

    pkg:rpm/redhat/ghostscript-tools-printing

    Red Hat · CVE-2026-112177 · Updated 2026-10-20T20:58:39+00:00
  • ghostscript.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 · known not affected

    Vendor assessment for this product only.

    Reason: vulnerable code not present

    pkg:rpm/redhat/ghostscript?arch=src

    Red Hat · CVE-2026-112177 · Updated 2026-10-20T20:58:39+00:00
  • libgs-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 · known not affected

    Vendor assessment for this product only.

    Reason: vulnerable code not present

    pkg:rpm/redhat/libgs-devel

    Red Hat · CVE-2026-112177 · Updated 2026-10-20T20:58:39+00:00
  • ghostscript as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 · known not affected

    Vendor assessment for this product only.

    Reason: vulnerable code not present

    pkg:rpm/redhat/ghostscript

    Red Hat · CVE-2026-112177 · Updated 2026-10-20T20:58:39+00:00
  • ghostscript-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 · known not affected

    Vendor assessment for this product only.

    Reason: vulnerable code not present

    pkg:rpm/redhat/ghostscript-devel

    Red Hat · CVE-2026-112177 · Updated 2026-10-20T20:58:39+00:00
  • ghostscript-gtk as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 · known not affected

    Vendor assessment for this product only.

    Reason: vulnerable code not present

    pkg:rpm/redhat/ghostscript-gtk

    Red Hat · CVE-2026-112177 · Updated 2026-10-20T20:58:39+00:00
  • ghostscript.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 · known not affected

    Vendor assessment for this product only.

    Reason: vulnerable code not present

    pkg:rpm/redhat/ghostscript?arch=src

    Red Hat · CVE-2026-112177 · Updated 2026-10-20T20:58:39+00:00
  • ghostscript as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 · known not affected

    Vendor assessment for this product only.

    Reason: vulnerable code not present

    pkg:rpm/redhat/ghostscript

    Red Hat · CVE-2026-112177 · Updated 2026-10-20T20:58:39+00:00
  • ghostscript-cups as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 · known not affected

    Vendor assessment for this product only.

    Reason: vulnerable code not present

    pkg:rpm/redhat/ghostscript-cups

    Red Hat · CVE-2026-112177 · Updated 2026-10-20T20:58:39+00:00
  • ghostscript-doc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 · known not affected

    Vendor assessment for this product only.

    Reason: vulnerable code not present

    pkg:rpm/redhat/ghostscript-doc

    Red Hat · CVE-2026-112177 · Updated 2026-10-20T20:58:39+00:00
  • ghostscript-gtk as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 · known not affected

    Vendor assessment for this product only.

    Reason: vulnerable code not present

    pkg:rpm/redhat/ghostscript-gtk

    Red Hat · CVE-2026-112177 · Updated 2026-10-20T20:58:39+00:00
  • ghostscript.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 · known not affected

    Vendor assessment for this product only.

    Reason: vulnerable code not present

    pkg:rpm/redhat/ghostscript?arch=src

    Red Hat · CVE-2026-112177 · Updated 2026-10-20T20:58:39+00:00
  • libgs-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 · known not affected

    Vendor assessment for this product only.

    Reason: vulnerable code not present

    pkg:rpm/redhat/libgs-devel

    Red Hat · CVE-2026-112177 · Updated 2026-10-20T20:58:39+00:00
  • ghostscript as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 · known not affected

    Vendor assessment for this product only.

    Reason: vulnerable code not present

    pkg:rpm/redhat/ghostscript

    Red Hat · CVE-2026-112177 · Updated 2026-10-20T20:58:39+00:00
  • ghostscript-doc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 · known not affected

    Vendor assessment for this product only.

    Reason: vulnerable code not present

    pkg:rpm/redhat/ghostscript-doc

    Red Hat · CVE-2026-112177 · Updated 2026-10-20T20:58:39+00:00
  • ghostscript-tools-fonts as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 · known not affected

    Vendor assessment for this product only.

    Reason: vulnerable code not present

    pkg:rpm/redhat/ghostscript-tools-fonts

    Red Hat · CVE-2026-112177 · Updated 2026-10-20T20:58:39+00:00
  • ghostscript-tools-printing as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 · known not affected

    Vendor assessment for this product only.

    Reason: vulnerable code not present

    pkg:rpm/redhat/ghostscript-tools-printing

    Red Hat · CVE-2026-112177 · Updated 2026-10-20T20:58:39+00:00
  • ghostscript-x11 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 · known not affected

    Vendor assessment for this product only.

    Reason: vulnerable code not present

    pkg:rpm/redhat/ghostscript-x11

    Red Hat · CVE-2026-112177 · Updated 2026-10-20T20:58:39+00:00
  • libgs as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 · known not affected

    Vendor assessment for this product only.

    Reason: vulnerable code not present

    pkg:rpm/redhat/libgs

    Red Hat · CVE-2026-112177 · Updated 2026-10-20T20:58:39+00:00
  • libgs-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 · known not affected

    Vendor assessment for this product only.

    Reason: vulnerable code not present

    pkg:rpm/redhat/libgs-devel

    Red Hat · CVE-2026-112177 · Updated 2026-10-20T20:58:39+00:00

All CVSS metrics

  • HIGH 7.3 v3.1 · CNA Primary
    CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
  • HIGH 7.3 v3.1 · NVD Secondary
    CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

References

Advisories

Technical & other

Sources: NVD · CVE.org · EPSS